🔗 Share this article

Turns out he was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Conflict Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach only to fire him for playing excessively that system. Hire the process guy and later discard them for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.